![]() |
![]() |
| Chelmsford Liberal Democrats | 5th September 2008 | <info@chelmsford-libdems.org.uk> |
£10 Million Overspend: Tories Propose Slashing Potholes Maintenance12.34.00pm GMT Fri 11th Jan 2008
Potholes in Chelmsford roads are going to get larger and not be fixed for longer. This bad news comes this week as the ruling Conservatives on the Council try to balance the budget for road maintenance. These changes to Essex County Council's highways maintenance strategy come just weeks after the Conservatives announced a £10m overspend on the highways budget. Cllr Keith Francis (Chelmsford Central and Lib Dem spokesman for transportation) said: "The report outlining changes to the way potholes and other damage to roads and footpath are to be dealt with, is riddled with inconsistencies and it is hard to see how it will be of benefit to residents here. "The basic premise seems to be to wait until damage to road surfaces get worse before even looking to see whether it should be fixed or not. The Conservatives are recommending that when dealing with misaligned kerbs, for example, there is no commitment at all to provide a date for work to be carried out." "Apart from the obvious inconvenience to the public, we have concerns about the additional hazard that damaged road and footpath surfaces will have for cyclists, motorcyclists and pedestrians alike. This will inevitably lead to more and higher level compensation claims being made against the council." The proposals are due to be discussed at a cross-party highways and transportation meeting next Thursday (17 January) at county hall. Cllr Francis continued: "The council has a duty to invest in all roads and footpaths in its care under a national code aimed at protecting state owned infrastructure. It seems to us that the council's proposals are a flagrant act of lack of care and responsibility in this regard."
Bookmark this story at:
Published and promoted by Chelmsford Liberal Democrats, Ian Gale, 20 Dane Road, Chelmsford, CM1 2SS. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |